I think this song might be unique in Simon's catalog in that the speaker is not a human, but an animal. The word choices seem-- to me-- to come from the mind of a dog or cat.
My theory is that someone told Simon (or maybe it happened to Simon himself) of an animal, adopted from a shelter, which escaped back on to the street. It would be an interesting topic for a song, the idea that even an animal might choose freedom over comfort... if comfort also meant constraint.
While this assertion may seem fanciful, a close reading of the lines, I feel, supports this hypothesis:
"You rescued me"-- This phrase is used frequently with regard to animals in shelters, which are often called, once they are adopted, "rescues." A person would more likely be "saved"; think of all the movies in which someone is saved from drowning or a fire. They say "Thank you for saving me!" or "(Gasp, hack, cough) You saved my life!"
"When I was blind"-- "when" means "I once was, but no longer am." And many small animals are born with their eyes shut, only to open them soon after.
"You put me on your pillow"-- Only an animal, and a small or baby one at that, would fit on a "pillow," or be invited to sleep on one. A person would not, and even a human baby is not set on a pillow, but in a crib or on a blanket.
"When I was on the wall"-- This is the phrase that clues me in to this reading of the song to begin with. I have been in animal shelters and that is how the animals are often kept, in cages that are stacked against a wall like bookshelves. A person is "against the wall," or "has his back to the wall." The only one "on" a wall was Humpty Dumpty; people are "on" a fence, maybe.
"You introduced me to your neighborhood"-- A person would be introduced to one's friends and family, not people who happened to live nearby. A dog, meanwhile, would be taken for a walk, during which it would likely be noticed and petted by shopkeepers and neighbors.
"Like the other humans do"-- Not "like other people do," as a person would say.
"...and you keep the window closed"-- A person would not leave over such an issue; they would politely ask for the window to be kept open. If the answer were 'no,' such a minor quibble would not amount, for most people, to be a "deal-breaker" and warrant leaving.
New pet owners, knowing that a lot of trouble had been gone through to get the dog off the street, and knowing that there were very good reasons for having done so, would naturally try to prevent their escape by keeping windows and door closed.
But an animal might, ironically, want the window open so that there was always the potential of freedom. The idea that freedom is not an option might induce a sense of being trapped and spark the urge to escape. If the window were open, the animal would feel that it was staying of its own accord; now that it cannot leave, it paradoxically must.
I understand that I may be alone in this interpretation of the song. It is possible that I have identified the underlying animal metaphor, and that the song is in fact about a person escaping a relationship that at first felt like a relief and now feels like a restraint; the lyrics certainly work on that level, too.
But I prefer to see the song as the thoughts of a dog or cat that was taken off the street by a shelter, then adopted, only to escape to the more familiar, free-ranging lifestyle it had grown accustomed to. It's certainly a new twist on the theme of songs like "Ramblin' Man" and "Free Bird," of the restless, dreamy drifter who just can't be tied down.
Next Song: Silent Eyes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I love this! Being no native speaker such "details" elude me completely.Very nice to read this.
ReplyDeleteAnon-- Thank you! I am glad you found this helpful, wherever you are from.
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly how I see the song. Good job
ReplyDeleteUnknown-- Thank you. It's nice to know that either I'm not crazy or at least one other person is the same kind of crazy...
ReplyDeleteI thought this must be a rescue animal for the same reason as you! It's the human reference that's always puzzled me. Glad I'm not the only one.Also,between them,S and G wrote some of the most amazing songs, especially on "Bookends", one of my very favourite albums of all time!
ReplyDeleteOh, which songs did Garfunkel write? I'm not familiar with his songwriting.
DeleteDoc Savage-- Garfunkel worked on many of the arrangements and Simon himself has said that Garfunkel's contributions were substantial. I think the word "wrote" was meant in the general sense here of "worked on."
DeleteMarilyn-- Thanks for validating my out-of-the-box theory. Also, I agree with you on Bookends as well.
ReplyDeleteAlways felt this was utterly obvious as most Paul Simon lyrics are quite clear.
ReplyDeleteDoc Savage-- If most Paul Simon lyrics were clear, there would be no need for this blog. And yet, hundreds of thousands of pageviews later, here we are.
ReplyDeleteThank you! This was my interpretation also!!
ReplyDeleteUnknown-- Thanks for the validation. It's nice to hear from a similar brain.
ReplyDeleteWith all due respect, your interpretation is cute and I suspect Paul Simon might get a kick out of it but this is not what the song is saying. The song You’re Kind is one of Paul’s cruelest songs. It conveys the ironic self-sabotage of a narrator who desperately needs love but is too wounded to accept love when it finally arrive (It makes me agitated when I think you’re going to love me now indefinitely). Like everyone, the narrator has a short-sighted impulse to be too picky: I’m going to leave you now and here’s the reason why—I like to sleep with the window open and you keep the window closed, so goodbye.” Such a petty reason for rejecting the most genuine love one has ever been offered. But so typical of those us who are self-loathing and emotionally stunted. This song is the brutal fist of reality, not a phony love song. This is one of Simon’s darkest songs. To make it even more brutal he puts it in a happy, major key and orchestrates it to have an upbeat, chipper vibe. That serves two purposes: textual irony, and the reinforcement of the narrator’s disconnection from his own reality.
ReplyDeleteAnon-- Interesting take. It's entirely possible that-- even if this is "about" a rescue animal that declined to be rescued-- that this imagery only forms a metaphor for a certain kind of person. And I agree that some people are too picky with potential partners, as shown on nearly every episode of "Seinfeld."
ReplyDeleteBut, is the person who rejects help necessarily "self-sabotaging" or "emotionally stunted," as you say? Or merely someone with a fiercely independent streak? Yes, we all need other people, but some need them more and for a long time... and others, not so much.
Some bristle at the idea of being taken care of (let alone caring for others)-- so even when they admit they need an accept some help for now, they do not see this as the seed of a relationship going forward. The caregiver sees this person as a new friend; that person sees the caregiver as a gas-station attendant-- "Now that you have filled my current need, I'll be on my way, thanks!"
Contrast this to the relationship of "Gone at Last," in which a similarly "downcast" soul also "grabs [the] sympathy" of a caregiving type... and, in commiserating, they form a bond: "Our burdens will be shared." To some, help leads to friendship... but not everyone.
Further, is "You're Kind"'s caregiver truly selfless? Not all caregivers are-- they may seem so to others, but to the subject of their care they feel suffocating. This could be the meaning of an open vs. closed window-- "I like to have options and outside friends, you want to keep me all to yourself."
This caregiver didn't offer a separate bed, but their own "pillow." They introduced them to their own neighborhood ("See, neighbors, now nice I am? I took in this stray!") and didn't try to find them their own friends and community. Say this is a dog-- did they show off their rescue dog to their next-door neighbor, or take the dog to a dog park to meet other dogs?
Ultimately, they didn't feel mothered, but smothered, and hit the open road again. [How many hundreds of songs are there about "ramblin'" types?]
So yes, this song could certainly be about a person and not at animal. But maybe Simon was trying to explore WHY some people reject help, or only accept it in small doses.. and then trot along down the road.
There are two sides to every story, but sometimes each side is telling a whole different story about the same relationship-- that the other doesn't know even happened.